Let’s compare the main performance indicators for the basic and new development options, which differ in the volume of SOPs and IPs, value added, OPF and the average annual number of employees. Based on the data of Table. 6.8 we will calculate the values of the general parameters of the efficiency of the economy and compare their indicators with similar indicators of the basic variant, Table. 6.10.
Table 6.10 Resource requirements
Indicators of the overall efficiency of the economy of the basic
and new options
| Basic option | New version (Y=110; 0) | Note | |
| Share of intermediate product in SOPs, % | 86 | 85 | -1 (efficiency gains) |
| Share of GDP in the intermediate product, % | 16 | 17,6 | +1,6 (increase in efficiency) |
| Capital intensity of GDP | 12,1 | 11,7 | -0.4 (efficiency increase) |
| Capital intensity of SOPs | 1,7 | 1,75 | +0.05 (decreased efficiency) |
| Labour productivity by GDP | 2 | 2,44 | +0.44 (increased efficiency) |
| Productivity under SOPs | 14,3 | 16,3 | +2 (increased efficiency) |
For all performance indicators, with the exception of the capital intensity of SOPs, there has been an upward shift. This is understandable, since agriculture, for which the CP has increased, is a less burdensome industry for the economy than industry.
We cannot help but notice the very large values of the generalizing figures of the total costs of all factors. In our example, these are conditional values. They are inflated compared to the real ones, but not several times. Therefore, the real costs of the factors, as will be shown below, are quite significant.